{"id":2938,"date":"2025-04-29T09:58:34","date_gmt":"2025-04-29T06:58:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thedefender.media\/?post_type=insights&p=2938"},"modified":"2025-11-18T20:46:13","modified_gmt":"2025-11-18T18:46:13","slug":"ukrainian-military-tech-goes-dual-use","status":"publish","type":"insights","link":"https:\/\/thedefender.media\/en\/insights\/ukrainian-military-tech-goes-dual-use\/","title":{"rendered":"Ukrainian defence tech innovators tap into western dual-use markets"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In March 2025, Kyiv hosted the Dual-Use Invest Demo Day co-organised by the Ukrainian Startup Fund (USF) and the government-backed Brave1 defence tech cluster. The goal: to attract Western capital and partnerships for Ukraine\u2019s \u201cdual-use\u201d tech \u2014 solutions battle-tested on the frontlines and now poised for public markets. At this first-of-its-kind event, nine Ukrainian startups pitched innovations with both civilian and military applications. Representatives from Avellum, Rovertech, D3, and Green Flag wrapped up the event with a panel discussion on dual-use definition, opportunities, and the potential for Ukrainian innovations in this sector.<\/strong><\/strong> Defender presents the key takeaways<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Startups bridging civilian and military<\/strong><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Among the most promising vectors of Ukrainian dual-use tech development are unmanned ground vehicles designed to \u201csniff out\u201d and clear landmines. Ukraine\u2019s territory is now one of the most mined in the world, and these rovers have been saving soldiers\u2019 lives by performing dangerous clearance tasks remotely. But its value isn\u2019t confined to the battlefield. With an estimated 174,000 square kilometres of Ukrainian land contaminated with mines and countless more in post-conflict zones globally, where the dynamics between ceasefire and active combat vary from day to day. In such conditions, demining robots could play a major role in humanitarian demining and agricultural revival.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of such projects is Ukrainian Rovertech<\/strong><\/a>, which develops unmanned ground systems. \u201cIn the beginning, we started with the idea of a battlefield demining machine, but then we saw a community purpose,\u201d said the founder, Borys Drozhak.<\/strong> Remote demining system “Zmiy,” which is actively used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) and has recently been spotlighted<\/a> by The Telegraph, can help farmers and construction crews safely reclaim their job sites in the future. This dual mission of military safety in combination with civilian rebuilding made Rovertech a textbook dual-use venture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Demining
Demining robot “Zmiy”. Photo by RoverTech<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Not every project, however, neatly fits the peaceful side of dual-use. The panelists also noted that many of the military-only projects are using dual-use framing as a disguise, and urged closer vetting for compliance. But the overarching message from Ukraine\u2019s innovators was that dual-use isn\u2019t about diluting military tech for civilian palatability \u2014 it\u2019s about recognising that modern inventions can wear two hats<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Redefining \u201cDual-Use\u201d in a time of war<\/strong><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

One of the liveliest discussions was: what does \u201cdual-use\u201d even mean nowadays?<\/strong> Historically, dual-use referred to commercial tech that also had defence applications \u2013 a way to keep startups afloat until the realization via military procurement. Dual-use can be a survival strategy, panelists explained, as in some countries defence procurement can drag on so long that \u201cby the time the [military buys] you, you will be dead three times\u201d \u2013 hence startups are sometimes advised to find civilian customers first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But with Ukraine\u2019s wartime demand, that dynamic flipped. The Ministry of Defence, and especially the selected AFU units, became fast-moving customers. For the past year alone, Ukraine\u2019s spending on drones surged to above $2.5 billion<\/a>. The war created a strong domestic market \u2013 a startup making battlefield drones or sensor systems could quickly find a buyer in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, with no dual-use pivot required (at least initially).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Read more:<\/strong> Turning Ukraine\u2019s war-born innovations into global ventures: interview with founders of Invest in Bravery<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo, we do not see [Ukrainian] companies pursuing a dual-use or civilian-only strategy first and then building a defence use case. Because there is a real market with relatively fast processes, where you don’t need to wait for years and years to be procured. There is a market, where the speed of innovation is absolutely incredible,\u201d underlined Anton Verkhovodov from D3 VC<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Participants
Participants of the panel discussion from left to right: Founder and CEO of RoverTech Borys Drozhak, Founding Partner at Green Flag Ventures Deborah Fairlamb, Partner at D3 VC Anton Verkhovodov, Partner at Avellum Andriy Romanchuk<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, he also noted how the appetites for defence are growing very rapidly in Europe. \u201cYou know, a once peaceful alliance is now deciding how to spend 800 billion euros on defence<\/a>,<\/strong>\u201d Verkhovodov reminded, illustrating how NATO and EU countries are boosting defence budgets to record levels. In this climate, the old ethical line around dual-use is blurring. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some institutional funds still outright ban investing in anything intended to kill \u2014 leading to what Verkhovodov called \u201cridiculous\u2026 \u2018vegetarian\u2019 tech\u201d preferences, where VCs say they\u2019ll back defence projects only if they\u2019re non-lethal. While others see supporting Ukraine\u2019s defence as a moral imperative. The Ukrainian founders navigating this landscape are having to balance perception and purpose. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cFrankly, now these definitions have become really harmful. What started as a very good strategy for startups to survive years [of waiting] for the contract, because this is what it takes in the United States for the government to approve the new budget, has now turned into a forest of definitions,\u201d stressed Verkhovodov. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Many have to learn not to water down a clearly military product just to appease skittish investors. \u201cThis is your company, not the investor\u2019s. Don\u2019t change your strategy based on investors who aren\u2019t even on your cap table. Be yourself,\u201d he concluded. For Ukrainian innovators, his thesis is simple \u2014 authenticity is a part of the pitch<\/strong>. Whether the tech is lethal, non-lethal, or somewhere in between, own it and then highlight any broader benefits for society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The long road to international procurement<\/strong><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Even as Western interest grows, Ukraine\u2019s miltech startups face practical hurdles in reaching global markets. One major challenge is regulatory bureaucracy \u2013 an area where Ukraine is learning to streamline procurement for faster deployment of new technologies. On one hand, the government has dramatically fast-tracked some processes. For example, defen\u0441e startups in Ukraine are required to obtain a NATO Stock Number (NSN) \u2013 a crucial cataloging code that lets NATO militaries buy their product. Getting an NSN often takes up to three years in a NATO country, but in Ukraine it can now take as little as 3 months (or even 3 weeks)<\/a>. That means a Kyiv-based company can more quickly integrate into NATO supply chains, smoothing the path to export.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Read more: <\/strong>Where\u2019s the money? Brave1, Double Tap Investments, UVCA, and Promavtomatika on funding for Ukrainian defence startups<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The final advice: listen to the requirements, grind through them, and embrace the process as a mark of legitimacy. After all, a NATO country or Western clients will expect nothing less.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ukraine\u2019s dual-use tech on the world stage<\/strong><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Founding Partner <\/strong>at Green Flag Ventures<\/strong><\/a> Deborah Fairlamb reminded that a significant number of defen\u0441e startups eventually get acquired by the big companies. That isn\u2019t viewed by Fairlamb as something bad. On the contrary, as a likely path to scale up production and distribution globally. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Such opportunities for the Ukrainian miltech startups, in her opinion, will depend on the war\u2019s trajectory and government policies. At the same time, Fairlamb points out that civilian uses of Ukrainian wartime innovation will proliferate too. At the end of the day, she reminds that even the microwave oven was famously born from WWII radar research:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cYou know, if you look at a lot of the amazing technology that’s come out of Israel in the last, say, 15 or 20 years, all of the cyber security companies and a number of the products that are out there right now\u2026 actually, all came out of things that have been developed within the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]. So, it’s just a sort of a natural progression in the context of things that were first developed within a military or government contract context. And then there’s applicability outside as well.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Pitch
Pitch of one of the startups at Dual-Use Invest Demo Day<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Today\u2019s Ukrainian breakthroughs might similarly become ubiquitous. Dual-use, as a concept, may even fade away. As Fairlamb noted, the time may come when we drop the label because \u201cwe\u2019re going to see so much stuff come out of this\u201d that the distinction won\u2019t matter. Military or civilian \u2014 it\u2019s just good technology.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For now, Ukraine\u2019s miltech entrepreneurs are pressing forward with a sense of urgency and purpose. They juggle investor calls in California one day and testing out on the firing range the next. And they\u2019re motivated not only by profit or pioneering spirit, but by something larger \u2014 safety and security of their families. Ukraine\u2019s innovators have learned the hard way that the distance from the battlefield to the boardroom can be short \u2013 and that technologies proven in battle can help keep families safe in war and in peace times. As Western markets open up to these battle-tested solutions, the world is already finding out what this new wave of Ukrainian dual-use innovators can do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"Viktor<\/figure>
\n

Viktor Kharyton<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Viktor Kharyton is a columnist at Defender Media, who writes about Ukrainian defence tech at the intersection with European and international affairs, strategic communications and AI. Viktor consults for organizations spanning defence and security, energy, agriculture, and healthcare sectors.
<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n